Update

I had a strong discussion last night about the break in of email accounts. 3 people's emails were hijacked; one containing huge amounts of evidence in this cyber crime case.

As well, victims are now being harassed and friends and family, and this has been done in past but not brought to the foreground until now. This has come to light in recent days. Why must people be harassed for telling the truth and for being acquainted with all of this? Is the family of the accused that scared? What is the real reason?

One victim was told she was married 3 times. We did research into that and it says same day and month for the marriages. That is not possible. How can a person be married 3 times to different people in the same month and year? Also, the spelling of the last name is not hers. As well anyone can go to a registrar office to get married and only something as little as an ID card is required. Anyone can obtain an ID card in anyone's name. We contacted sites in the Uk in which they claim "they do not guarantee the accuracy of the records made public". Also, anyone at anytime can put forward a complaint and file to have untrue records removed from the system. That matter is being dealt with now. Also it states, "We check that both the bride and groom are stated on the same certificate when checking marriage references. You can apply under one name but if you cross reference both parties the reference numbers must be identical. However, there is more than one marriage on each page of the original records, so cross referencing does not guarantee they married each other". The Data Protection Act governing body has been contacted for concern over leakage of other private information which is not legal to do. If found information was accessed without legal cause complaints will be put forth to the known parties.

None of this marriage stuff matters because it has nothing to do with the cyber crime. It is good it was brought to the surface so that the matter can be cleared in records if need be. The accused family is grasping for something. If relationships had to do with the cyber crime then the matters of being lied too and false marriage promises, harassment to suicide, with the medical records, etc would be investigated and that turned over to the police. There is no investigation of it. That is not why the FIR was launched.

We were going to put up the proof of the videos, song, etc but have now decided against it. We will leave that where it needs to be so that all things can be proven. Otherwise it just gives the family of the accused a heads up of what they can expect. Why bother giving them that control? They already think they have control with trying to discredit people, yet when things are shown, facts/evidence are in place they will see how they too were fooled by the culprit.